TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Perfect binding vs. 3-ring binders From:Horace Smith <hsmith -at- WT -dot- NET> Date:Sat, 26 Sep 1998 18:06:56 -0500
Cost is certainly a factor, but how about customer consideration?
Remember,
1. 3-ring binders open flat and stay that way. Try to fix something when
you have to use two hands to hold the manual open.
2. Manuals in binders update easily. If the customer doesn't do the
update, that's not your problem.
At 06:56 AM 9/23/98 -0600, Geoff Hart wrote:
>Mark Dykstra <<[would] like to write a convincing case that we would
>be better off going with perfect binding [than 3-ring binders]>>
>
>geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
>
>When an idea is wanting, a word can always be found to take its
place.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
>
>
>From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
>
>
>
