Re: Front Page Fussy

Subject: Re: Front Page Fussy
From: Peter Taylor <sector_five -at- HOTMAIL -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:04:53 PST

>On 12-01-1999 23:41 Tracy Boyington answered Peter Taylor:
>
>>> Look at it this way: You paid around $75-$100 dollars to purchase
[snip]
>>been done wrong.* I consider that a failure for any product.
>
>Why do we maintain a double standard for quality here, Peter, one for
our
>work and one for our tools: You would not accept a manual holding 25%
of
>inaccurate information (I presume...). But for a piece of software by
>Microsoft you have a 'build-in' error factor.
>What makes this name so particular to reserve a softer quality to it?
>Any suggestions?

We took this thread off-line a while ago. I'm not particularly
interested in continuing it, but you may email me privately if you feel
strongly about it.

Peter Taylor.

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=




Previous by Author: Re: Peter Taylor's thread:
Next by Author: Re: Canadian Spelling
Previous by Thread: Re: Front Page Fussy
Next by Thread: Re: Front Page Fussy


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads