TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Political Correctness Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth?
Subject:Re: Political Correctness Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth? From:"Brierley, Sean" <Brierley -at- QUODATA -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 26 Apr 1999 17:05:51 -0400
That sounds like an interesting paper. Some thoughts,
1. If I read "four manmonths" to finish a job, for some reason I picture
hairy elephants moving logs, but perhaps that's because I rarely run into
the term <g>.
2. My serious thought on policemen versus police officers is that I
associate the profession with males, not the term. How does your research
address that issue?
The term police officers conjures an image of a ranking police officials
whereas policemen conjures an image of a regular patrolmen or constables. I
count two policewomen among my friends and believe I have lack of respect
for them in their profession despite that hang-up. I certainly do refer to
them as "Officer Nancy," or whatever the name happens to be.
Furthermore, if I hear the term chairman, I picture a man. If I hear the
term chairwoman or chairperson, I picture a woman. If I hear the term chair
(except when used as a verb or when folks members are cautioned to address
"the chair" directly), I usually picture a woman also, the reason being I
sense the term chairman is being deliberately avoided.
I find man-hours and manmonths to be fairly concise terms and, no offense
intended, find your workaround of "it will take the team 3 weeks of effort
each, working over three months" awkward versus "it will take three
manmonths."
As I said, your research sounds interesting. I don't suppose you have it
available as a PDF??
Thanks and all the best.
Sean
sean -at- quodata -dot- com
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ginna Watts [mailto:gwatts -at- QUESTERCORP -dot- COM]
>>>Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 4:24 PM
>>>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>>>Subject: Re: Political Correctness Re: Manmonth or Peoplemonth?
>>>
>>>
>>>I wrote rather a lengthy essay on the topic of
>>>gender-specific language
>>>in university. Before I did the research, I believed it
>>>didn't matter -
>>>now I know it does.
>>>
<snip>