Cutting a contract short

[Jim Barrow]

>Richard Combs wrote:
>>James Barrow wrote:

> >Hmmm...I'm not sure if anyone here suggested that since they 
> >had been screwed over in the past that it was okay to do that 
> >to a company.  Several people here have related feeling like 
> >a company had treated them like a commodity.  Applying that 
> >to Anonymous' post, there were also several people here who 
> >would have no problem exercising the "no notice necessary" 
> >part of their contracts, and not to worry about burning 
> >bridges or annoying the company.

>Actually, my post was prompted by someone who rather explicitly *did*
>suggest that: 

Do you see how sneaky those posts can be?  That one got right by me.

[]

>I have no idea what "exercising the 'no notice necessary' part of their
>contracts" refers to. 

I seem to recall one post mentioning that if Anonymous’ contract didn’t require notice be given to her employer, then he/she could leave more easily.

As an aside, all of my contracts specifically mentioned this.  I’ve never been part of a contract that required me to give notice in the event that I resigned.