[TCP] certification (was: ranting STC)
Ned Bedinger
doc at edwordsmith.com
Wed Feb 28 19:55:03 MST 2007
Donald H. White wrote:
> I still have no idea why the concept of a professionalization program causes
> so much ire.
I don't know about ire, but it does raise the issue of trust. Who would
you trust to codify what it takes to be a certified tech writer? And who
would you trust to understand what being certified means? To me it
seems that interest in a general tech writing cert is trying to treat
tech writing as if it were tech support, but it isn't so easy to say
what competences are necessary for tech writing. For some jobs, we'd be
qualified if we can write. In others, we'd be lost if we can't create
C++ sample code. Who understands these things and thinks that any sort
of general tech writing certicate makes sense? I'll answer the
question: people who need only one type of tech writer and aren't aware
of the enormous variety that exists in our field.
> You go into an interview armed with your very good,
> well-written and targeted resume as well as an outstanding portfolio and use
> your winning personality to...not get the job. Why? Millions of reasons.
>
Are you saying that certification would change this? If so, how?
> Can professionalization hurt those who might undertake it? No.
I don't know. But can "professionalization" replace the need of
companies to understand their own documentation and training
requirements? Certainly not, and that is what I think certification
promises to do, however unlikely it is to be able to do that.
> Can it hurt
> those who don't undertake it? Maybe; depends upon how employers perceive and
> receive the program.
Employers often perceive a degree in CSci or TechComm as a minimum
requirement. They're just trying to demonstrate some awareness that
professional tech writers are different from the teeming masses of
people who can write. No doubt some would subscribe to a certification
scheme too.
> If having a certification helped me obtain work from
> employers who specifically advertise for those holding professionalization,
> then I'd go for it.
Are you going to hold your breath waiting for it? :-)
Ned Bedinger
doc at edwordsmith.com
More information about the TECHWR-L
mailing list