40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)
Dan Goldstein
DGoldstein at riverainmedical.com
Tue Jul 3 06:51:49 MDT 2007
Right, and then the next guy replies, "I think that anyone who can do
their work in 35 can probably do it in 30." The choice of 35 as
"reasonable" is as random as the choice of 40 or 45.
Does anyone have any research that suggests that tech writers can
accomplish as much work in 35 hours as in 40, or as much in 40 hours as
in 45?
That's what I thought.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ned Bedinger
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:18 PM
> To: Mary Arrotti
> Cc: techwr-l at lists.techwr-l.com
> Subject: Re: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)
>
> ... Personally, I think that anyone who can do
> their work in 40 can probably do it in 35.
>
This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.
More information about the TECHWR-L
mailing list