40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)

[Simon North]

Stuart Burnfield says: 

> I do think there's a point of diminishing returns. Your sixtieth hour
in 
> a given week won't be as productive as any of the first forty hours.
In 
> fact if you work sixty-hour weeks for any length of time none of
those 
> hours will be as productive as a normal hour in a forty hour week.

I really do think this is a case of 'your mileage may vary'. I
routinely work 
80 to 90 hour weeks (not all at my 'day job' though); have done for
years, 
and I still wish I had more hours in the day. Sleep's for the weak. 

Simon. 
  


This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of Quintiq. It is only intended for the person to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not
authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute or use
this message or any part thereof. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of
this message. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change,
therefore they are not binding.