FTBE

[Chris Borokowski]

I think you and Richard missed my point, and as I've
been saying, I'm not limiting what others can do, but
describing their position in the architecture process.


I never insulted QAs or stated that they couldn't
contributed, but did point out that their role in
fixing bugs is remedial and not architectural. This is
a fundamental difference in practice between
design-level fixes and functional fixes.

I think what's happening here is that several people
perceived my comments as an attack on QAs, which they
were not, and decided to flame me as a result. I'm not
interested in the drama, and so my responses are less
than reassuring to you.

--- Connie Giordano <connie at therightwordz.com> wrote:

> I think you missed Richard's point.
> 
> Seems to me that professional QA's role is no more
> "to find and fix errors" than a TW's is to "find and
> fix typos".  Your desire to expand the role of
> technical communications should not limit the
> ability of other professionals to contribute to
> product development.


User Interface design blog
http://user-advocacy.blogspot.com/
Code::Design::UI::Consulting
http://www.dionysius.com/


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7