Any comments on Word 2007?

Dan Goldstein DGoldstein at riverainmedical.com
Thu Mar 1 13:24:31 MST 2007


Yeah, the writer was supposed to edit the DOC, that's why the writer
edited the DOC. The writer did the right thing. What's your point?

Anyway, as Sean pointed out, this is ancient history. The "X" versions
(including version 6) don't require Word.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Char James-Tanny
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 3:19 PM
> To: techwr-l at lists.techwr-l.com
> Subject: Re: Any comments on Word 2007?
> 
> > Right, that was my mistake -- the compiler used the RTF, 
> > but the writer edited the DOC.
> 
> But the writer was supposed to edit the .doc...RoboHelp for Word has a
> macro attached to the Save function that saves the doc, saves the doc
> as rtf, and then saves the rtf as doc. You can see it working if the
> doc is big enough (the status messages are updated with each step),
> but for smaller docs, the messages fly by.
> 

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter.  Thank you.




More information about the TECHWR-L mailing list