Bullfighter diagnosis on post (was Re: Writing Corrective Actions for customers?)
Tim Mantyla
TimMantyla at nustep.com
Tue Apr 22 14:01:09 MDT 2008
Gentlemen,
FWIW, the Bullfighter gives Ned a composite score of 8.8 out of 10 for
this composition, and 63 out of 100 on the Flesch reading index, as
convoluted as it sounds.
Its verbal diagnosis: "Mostly clear, with some unnecessarily long words
and sentences. You get to the point, although with an occasional detour.
Most educated readers will navigate the text with no difficulty. Longer
words and sentences appear occasionally."
Perfect scores of 10 and 100, respectively, would rate this diagnosis:
"Clear. You get to the point. Short sentences describe key thoughts
concisely. Readers of all levels can focus on the message rather than
finding their way through difficult text. The good Dr. Flesch would be
proud of you."
This is a fun app. Find it at www.fightthebull.com.
--Tim
Ned Bedinger wrote on 04/22/2008 02:00:00 AM:
> The question was about a corporate client, and the apparent context was
> that of a freelancer. Freelancers, since you seem to lack the concept,
> have discretion in the work they accept.
>
> Where one gets off dumping on people who preserve their freedonm in this
> regard is something you'll have to explain to me, unless your egregious
> offensiveness is intended. You three sound like unreconstructed
> bottom-feeders and tyrants.
> Please spend your efforts getting a clue instead of defacing the list
> with these self-absorbed self-congratulatory public, offensive, and
> apparently ignorant comments.
>
> I yield the balance of my time to anyone else whpo wants to bash back on
> these pompous twits.
>
> Ned Bedinger
> doc at edwordsmith.com
> Ned Bedinger wrote on 22/04/2008 10:00:34 AM:
> > Where one gets off dumping on people who preserve their freedonm in
this
>
> > regard is something you'll have to explain to me, unless your
egregious
> > offensiveness is intended. You three sound like unreconstructed
> > bottom-feeders and tyrants.
>
> I'm a tyrant because I think it reasonable to assign a tech
communications
> task to a tech communicator?
>
> As for the first sentence above, I can't make heads or tails of it. You
> may be having a bad day or, alternatively, you could be chronically
> incapable of constructing a coherent sentence. If the latter, that would
> be something you should be working on while you're celebrating your
> "freedom".
>
> --
> Mike West
> Melbourne, Australia
More information about the TECHWR-L
mailing list