"Developers Guide", "Developers' Guide", or "Developer's Guide"

Gordon McLean Gordon.McLean at GrahamTechnology.com
Wed Feb 13 06:54:54 MST 2008


Spot on Fred. "Installing..." it is.
 
And yes, the upfront design of a documentation set is usually not ever
performed, legacy documents are maintained and added to, with new ones
falling into place as you go along. Of course then, when you rename things
to make them sensible and consistent, outcry! 
 
Can't win. ;-)
 
Gordon
 

  _____  

From: Fred Ridder [mailto:docudoc at hotmail.com] 
Sent: 13 February 2008 13:51
To: Gordon McLean; techwr-l at lists.techwr-l.com
Subject: RE: "Developers Guide", "Developers' Guide", or "Developer's Guide"


Gordon McLean wrote:

> Which prompts me to ponder why the other types aren't titled:
> 
> Using [product name]
> Developing with/on/for ...
> 
> In other words, if an Installation Guide is focussed on the task of
> installing a product, why aren't the others focussed on the tasks of
using,
> developing, maintaining, administering... etc.
 
If parallelism is the goal, these titles still have a problem unless you
give
the guide that covers installation a title of the form "Installing [product 
name]".  And while I do like using verb participles (sometimes referred to
as gerunds, even though they are usually not being used as nouns) in 
headings that idenitfy procedures, I'm not crazy about them in titles
of works.  
 
But what *can* work in many cases is to form titles with the noun
for the task being documented rather than the person performing the 
task, as in:
  Administration Guide
  Development Guide (or perhaps Application Development Guide)
  Installation Guide 
  Maintenance Guide
The one place where this approach is awkward is the classic one,
namely the user's guide.  But part of the problem may be that this
title is often used for a catch-all document that contains information
on multiple tasks (e.g. installation and configuration as well as how
to use the product, plus some reference information just for good 
measure).  So the problem may be a more fundamental one of
information design than a simple matter of an awkward title. 
 
Fred Ridder
 
 
 


  _____  

Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! Learn more.
<http://biggestloser.msn.com/>  

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
This email (and any attachments) is private and confidential, and is intended solely for the
addressee. If you have received this communication in error please remove it and inform us via
telephone or email. Although we take all possible steps to ensure mail and attachments
are free from malicious content, malware and viruses, we cannot accept any responsibility
whatsoever for any changes to content outwith our administrative bounds. The views represented
within this mail are solely the view of the author and do not reflect the views of the organisation
as a whole.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Graham Technology plc
Registered in Scotland company no. SC143434
Registered Office India of Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, Scotland PA4 9LH
                                                
http://www.grahamtechnology.com
____________________________________________________________________________________________________


More information about the TECHWR-L mailing list