active vs. passive voice

[Ned Bedinger]

Andrew Warren wrote:
> Susan W Gallagher wrote:
> 
>> This page
>> http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/passive.htm
>> offers
>> <quote>Only transitive verbs (those that take objects) can be
>> transformed into passive constructions. Furthermore, active sentences
>> containing certain verbs cannot be transformed into passive
> structures.
>> *To have* is the most important of these verbs. We can say "He has a
>> new car," but we cannot say "A new car is had by him." We can say
>> "Josefina lacked finesse," but we cannot say "Finesse was lacked."
>> </quote>      
>>
>> I've never seen it stated quite so clearly before, but it makes sense
>> when you think about it.
> 
> Sure... Until you realize that we DO say "A good time was had by all."


Well I'll be hornswoggled, looks like someone has been borrowing from 
the neighbors again. Heehee :-) Not against the rules?

I hope a list reader with knowledge of Nederland's grammar will weigh in 
  on this one. To my unschooled eye it looks like a good English 
translation of a good Dutch pseudo-passive construction of a good 
intransitive verb. Thanks for your help.

Cheers,

Ned Bedinger
doc at edwordsmith.com