Definition of Tech Writer, was STC is broken

Sean Brierley sbrierley at Accu-Time.com
Fri May 2 13:36:14 MDT 2008


I disagree.

But what the heck, it's Friday and 5 o'clock (well, somewhere ...).

Cheers.



-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+sbrierley=accu-time.com at lists.techwr-l.com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+sbrierley=accu-time.com at lists.techwr-l.com] On
Behalf Of Lauren
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 3:24 PM
To: 'Dan Goldstein'; techwr-l at lists.techwr-l.com
Subject: RE: Definition of Tech Writer, was STC is broken

<snip>

My argument is untouched by any claims of high-risk technical documents.
I still believe that the processes that go into producing technical
documents mitigate the risks of the documents.  So that the end result
of technical writing is low-risk, although business documents contain
risks that exceed the scope of mitigation, so those documents have a
higher risk.  If a technical writer is producing a document that can
risk failure after its release, then maybe that writer should not be
writing.

Lauren


More information about the TECHWR-L mailing list