What about Technical Writer vs Communicator?

[Beth Agnew]

There's much good discussion about this topic, even when we don't agree. 
We are fortunate that our profession allows us to go as narrow or broad 
as we personally feel comfortable with. I agree with Deborah that if the 
STC engaged in educating the public and employers about all our many 
capabilities and potentials, we'd have far greater choice in the jobs we 
might be offered. When it comes to salary, the bottom line is that if 
your job is perceived as encompassing more responsible duties such as 
project management and interdepartmental co-operation, you are going to 
command a higher salary than if they think you just sit in your cubicle 
and turn out work. But there's nothing at all wrong with that if you're 
happy doing so.

The writing part of our job comes after we've carried out a great deal 
of communication to get the information we will then process. And when 
we're finished writing, that sets in motion more communication on the 
audience side. I like the point that we deal in "non-fiction prose" pure 
and simple. Other types of writers and communicators have different 
agendas for their writing -- selling the corporate spin, making an 
impression, catering to regulatory bodies, etc., but our common traits 
are clarity and understanding. We do that better than anyone else, and 
heaven knows the world needs more of it.

The only thing better than being a technical communicator is being an 
educator as well. Two dream jobs in one package -- no wonder I'm having 
such a good time!
--Beth

Beth Agnew, Professor
Co-ordinator, Technical Communication Program
Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology
Toronto, ON.