[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word

Subject: Re: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word
From: Marc Santacroce <epubs -at- ricochet -dot- net>
To: "Tim Altom" <taltom -at- simplywritten -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:27:07 -0800

My expectation is that the customer base is broad enough that someone will take Frame over if Adobe abandons it.

Tim Altom wrote:

Believe me, you're not the only person worrying about Adobe's apparent
disinterest in Frame. Those companies like ours that have Frame as their
centerpiece are nervous as a long-tailed cat in a roomful of rocking chairs.
It's a dynamite product, but we felt a lot more confident in its future when
it was owned by Frame Technology. At Adobe, it seems to be considered a
stepkid. I don't think it'll dry up and blow away myself, but sometimes
Adobe shakes my confidence.


Marc

-
Marc A. Santacroce

Senior Technical Writer/President
ePubs, Inc.

epubs -at- ricochet -dot- net


"Everything has a fifty percent probability; either it's going to happen, or it's not."


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: FW: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word
Next by Author: Re: Word 2000 vs. Word97
Previous by Thread: Re: FW: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word
Next by Thread: Re: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads