TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
At 11:54 PM 3/23/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>Okay, some loudmouth challenged me in private email to impart my
semi-brilliant
>vision for a tech comm curriculum. Just to show up the dingle-berry, I
offer up
>the following haphazardly thrown together Technical Communications
Curriculum.
Well, my first response is that this is no good whatsoever for people who
already have 4 year degrees and just want to transition to the tech writing
field. I already have a molecular biology degree, and I certainly don't
want to sit through basic physics, when I've already had 3 years of physics.
What I really, desperately, want to know if all of the stuff that you think
is so useless --layout, standard tech writing procedures, or techniques for
increasing readability.
I already know how to write technically accurate pieces of crud -- I went
to grad school for a year. ;) I can use so much passive voice, jargon, and
impossibly long, hard to understand sentences that no one would have a clue
what I'm saying.
And I'm 100% sure that I can handle having detailed, accurate text as well
as text that's pleasing to the eye and with a nice layout if someone would
only tell me how. Which fonts work when, how much white space is good, and
so forth.
So just give me a certification that teaches me about tech writing. Not
physics. I already know basic, Pascal, C, C++, FORTRAN, HTML, some
javascript, and even LOGO for goodness sakes.
And, oddly enough, my tech writing certification program is teaching me
just what I want to know.
(As an aside, in my program we haven't once been told which tool to use or
even really touched the subject. And I think Framemaker is terribly easy to
learn. And all of my teachers are non-academic people who are tech writers
"in real life".)
Sure, there are tech writing programs that are awful -- but every field has
schools with awful programs. Don't go to them.