RE: FrameMaker used with other HATs than WWP...

Subject: RE: FrameMaker used with other HATs than WWP...
From: Dan Emory <danemory -at- primenet -dot- com>
To: "Michele Marques" <marquesm -at- autros -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 12:45:49 -0700

At 02:00 PM 10/2/00 -0400, Michele Marques wrote:

The latest version of ForeHelp can import MIF files and seems to have some
useful options for controlling how it's brought in. Note that it cannot
import TIF images, vector images, or any images other than the types is
already knows about (BMP, GIF, JPG and maybe PNG).

On the other hand, if you also have WWP, you could use WWP to create the
help file, and then open it in ForeHelp for further tuning/development.
===================================================
The alternative to WWP is MIF2GO from Omni systems (www.omsys.com).
At $295 it's much cheaper and (many people think) better than WWP.

It takes MIF as input and produces XHML, HTML, XML, MS HTML, help, JavaHelp,
and winhelp without the need for a HAT. It also produces RTF from MIF, including
the graphics, and is far superior to the Frame's built-in RTF converter.
====================
| Nullius in Verba |
====================
Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates
FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing
Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory -at- primenet -dot- com
10044 Adams Ave. #208, Huntington Beach, CA 92646
---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to
majordomo -at- omsys -dot- com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.






Previous by Author: RE: FrameMaker releases (was FrameMaker vs Ventura)
Next by Author: The Advantage of Text Insets (was: To single source or not?)
Previous by Thread: RE: FrameMaker used with other HATs than WWP...
Next by Thread: RE: FrameMaker used with other HATs than WWP...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads