[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

[OT] Technically speaking (maybe)

Subject: [OT] Technically speaking (maybe)
From: "puppy vaugn" <puppy_vaugn -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:21:18 CDT

>From: Eric Ray <ericjray -at- yahoo -dot- com>
>Reply-To: ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com
>To: puppy vaugn <puppy_vaugn -at- hotmail -dot- com>
>Subject: Re: node vs. element
>Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
>
>This isn't about technical writing, therefore
>isn't appropriate to post to this list.

it is about writing and being technically acurate with the writing, so
therefore it is at least technically appropriate to post....


puppy

http://www.puppyvaugn.org

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.




Previous by Author: imports
Next by Author: Re: SUMMARY: Spelling out acronyms at first mention
Previous by Thread: Subject: National Technical Writing Contract Firms
Next by Thread: Questions for usability surveys

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads