Re: Avoiding and/or?

Subject: Re: Avoiding and/or?
From: edunn -at- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:13:40 -0500



Logically, OR already includes the senarios that Dan listed. There is no need
for the and/or construct.
In boolean logic XOR denotes excusive OR. Which means A XOR B is true for cases
of (A or B) but not for cases of (A and B).

But of course you have to wonder just which dictionary lawyers do use. For cases
involving the general public I'm not certain that everyone is clear that A or B
can include A and B. So maybe the use of such language in leagal text is to
avoid the need for lawyers as the nonlogical signees can not misinterpret the
language.

Eric L. Dunn

>>I think and/or is a preferred fudging phrase in legal documents.
>>
>>It allows the sentence to be interpreted as:
>>
>>A and B
>>or
>>A or B
>>or
>>not A and B
>>or
>>A and not B




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY.
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more
http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: The Origins of Techwriting (WAS:Re: Techwr-1 polls)
Next by Author: Re: Dialogue or dialog?
Previous by Thread: Re: Avoiding and/or?
Next by Thread: RE: Avoiding and/or?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads