RE: Got Process?

Subject: RE: Got Process?
From: Jim Shaeffer <jims -at- spsi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:57:49 -0500

The point about the STC tracks is well taken. (Research
the archives for discussions of a TECHWR-L conference.)
But (not to get all defensive about the STC), I'd like to
point out that "tools and methodologies" are the only
universal discussion points among writers.
We software documentation types are frequently chided
on this list for ignoring writers who write about
mechanical engineering, airplane maintenance, chemical
processing plants and the like.
Would you like to see those tracks as well?

Jim Shaeffer (jims -at- spsi -dot- com)

> -----Original Message--<--snipped-->---
> From: Smith, Martin [mailto:martin -dot- smith -at- encorp -dot- com]
> I also agree with Andrew that STC often exacerbates the
> problem. Rather than seminar after seminar about tools
> and methodologies, I would rather have the choice of
> attending an object-oriented programming track, a
> network security track, a relational database
> track, a telecommunications track...


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Attention ForeHelp and Doc-to-Help Users! Upgrade your existing product to
RoboHelp for only $299, through January 31st. RoboHelp can import your
existing Help projects! Learn how else RoboHelp can benefit you. www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Word styles, resumes, and being pragmatic
Next by Author: Re: Task or Role base user guide examples
Previous by Thread: RE: Got Process?
Next by Thread: RE: Got Process?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads