TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:converting data to information From:Nora von Gerichten <wlg -at- pacificcoast -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:28:36 -0800
We convert data into information.
(corollary: we also sometimes convert a lack of data into information)
Getting data into information is like stopping before the finish line. Data
needs to be turned into knowledge to be of any use. Your corollary of lack
of data into information seems a bit off. Data cannot be pulled out of the
sky but must be "unearthed", "found", all those nice archeological terms. I
am one of those nasty people who red pencil projects because their data was
pulled from the sky. As long as you use your corollary, you can not
withstand any rigors of anything.
I work closely with the World Health Organization (WHO) on collaborative
telemed projects in SA and Africa. I like the simplicity and elegance of
their idea of turning data into knowledge. There is a nice graphic that
goes with it and good text, albeit in a medical context.
Data in context is information and information in context is knowledge.
"We turn the radio static of information overload into (usually visual)
music for specified audiences."
This analogy needs more work to be rigorous. As is, it is poetry.
"We decipher and convey complex concepts into more easily comprehensible
packaging."
What does this have to do with the price of tea in China? You need a
transition from your "data to info" model. This statement appears at first
to be going from knowledge to data. Suggest you explore some of the
literature on tech transfer. Tech transfer is, in part, the social
acceptance of the technology, otherwise it is not sustainable. You have
necessary but not sufficient components to your presentation.
Don't mean to be harsh, just happened to have my red pencil in hand.
Nora
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you know you can get RoboHelp certified?
To learn how, visit http://www.ehelp.com/techwr. Be sure to also check out
our special pricing offers and promotions for RoboHelp 2002.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.