TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

RE: KM=BS (mostly)

Subject: RE: KM=BS (mostly)
From: Nora von Gerichten <wlg -at- pacificcoast -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:27:32 -0800

Question: Do any current Technical Writing education
programs address documenting the 'why'?

Why: credibility for billing.

I log 5 minute increments. Justifies my bill (just like professional accounts, lawyers, etc.). For me it is populating a data base for understanding my implicit processes, average time, etc.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check it out! Get some cool freebies when you buy RoboHelp! You'll receive
SnagIt screen capture software and a 10% discount voucher for RoboHelp
Consulting. This special offers expires March 29, 2002.
www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.

---

Previous by Author: RE: Knowledge Management
Next by Author: RE: is it really that uncommon?
Previous by Thread: RE: KM=BS (mostly)
Next by Thread: RE: KM=BS (mostly)

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

---

---

---