TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers From:Kevin McLauchlan <kmclauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:06:09 -0400
On Thursday 10 October 2002 15:44, John Posada wrote:
> >As I've said before, modern English speakers have a
> > grammatical neurosis. The prime symptom of this
> > neurosis is a greater concern with grammatical
> > correctness than with content.
> Not all of us. I didn't find that sig quote below...it
> is MY quote. Personally, and I'm gonna take flack for
> this, my attention to grammar does not make my top five
> considerations.
> My deliverable should be:
> 1- useful
> 2- technically accurate
> 3- what my user and my boss wants
> 4- on time
> 5- appealing
> 6- grammatically correct
> Different factors will affect the top 4 (such as 4 will
> move up, maybe not to 1, but up, if the document might
> hold up a release or a fix a Fatal error).
> However, nothing makes 6 move up.
And, that's as it should be. You can say it, of course,
because you have internalized the rules and don't
*need* to even consider grammar. Your tune would
probably change a bit, if you found yourself leading
a documentation project with writers who regularly
fractured their grammar.
I'll bet you'd gain a sudden concern for how stuff
looked when it was going out the door (or even to
the in-house reviewers) with your name on it.
Again, if you don't have a decent, subconcious grasp
of the fundamentals of your language, you probably
should not *be* in this business. We generally can't
*afford* to take the time to think about it. It has to
flow naturally. As well, you need to have it internalized
so that you can recognize when underlings/team-members/
contractors are giving you dreck.
/kevin
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
Buy ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 6.0, the most powerful SINGLE SOURCE HELP
AUTHORING TOOL for MS Word. SAVE $100 on the full version and $50 on the
upgrade. Offer ends 10/31/2002 (code: DTH102250). http://www.componentone.com/d2hlist1002
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.