Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers
Because grammar exists only to support the communication of intended
meaning, I can't conceive of something being "technically accurate" and
ungrammatical.
Consider what you do when you come across a typo, a spelling mistake, or the occasional disagreement between subject and predicate (you only have to check some of the posts I've dashed off without checking them to this list). Is the meaning of the sentence really so delicate that a single grammatical lapse forces it to collapse into gibberish? Of course not. You make a mental adjustment, possibly you start a sentence over again, and you move on. Clearly, it's completely possible to be technically accurate and ungrammatical.
That's not to say that error-free copy isn't the best way to communicate.If nothing else, you don't want to alienate readers by making them But a passage can have a large number of grammatical mistakes and still be comprehensible; any instructor who has survived marking first year university papers can vouch for that claim.
I think of grammatical errors as static on a radio. While a clear signal is desirable, meaning can still survive a good deal of static.
--
Bruce Byfield bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com 604.421.7177
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield
"Down, set down your liquor and your girl from off your knee;
For the wind has come to say, 'You must take me while you may,
If you'd go to Mother Carey (Walk her round to Mother Carey!)
We're bound to Mother Carey where she feeds her chicks at sea!'"
- Rudyard Kipling, "Anchor Song"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Buy ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 6.0, the most powerful SINGLE SOURCE HELP
AUTHORING TOOL for MS Word. SAVE $100 on the full version and $50 on the
upgrade. Offer ends 10/31/2002 (code: DTH102250).
http://www.componentone.com/d2hlist1002
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers, Bonnie Granat
- Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers, Brad Jensen
References:
RE: Yahoo has no staff tech writers: From: John Posada
Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers: From: Bonnie Granat
Previous by Author:
Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers
Next by Author:
Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers
Previous by Thread:
Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers
Next by Thread:
Re: Yahoo has no staff tech writers
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads