RE: dictator's - language

Subject: RE: dictator's - language
From: Mike West <Mike -dot- West -at- oz -dot- quest -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 17:36:45 +1100




> I didn't get , what "forcibly " suppose to mean , it means
> forcably nothing
> else and i am of opinion , it is not right to use such terms
> in manuals.


I don't think it's a matter of "right" or "wrong" --
it's a matter of clarity. If the term is explained,
and is used consistently, there's no problem.
If it isn't explained -- then problem!

--
Mike W
Melbourne


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Order RoboHelp X3 in December and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: dictator's - language
Next by Author: RE: doc'ing the docs (was RE: Hackos' minimalism seminar -- some insights)
Previous by Thread: RE: dictator's - language
Next by Thread: RE: dictator's - language


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads