RE: Basic Voice ??s: OK for Software to "allow", "let", "enable", "pr ovide" and so forth?

Subject: RE: Basic Voice ??s: OK for Software to "allow", "let", "enable", "pr ovide" and so forth?
From: Watson Laughton <WLaughton -at- orphan -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:44:57 -0600


> Wrong: The fubar function lets you foul things up beyond all
> possibility of recovery.

Not sure I'm seeing what the problem is with saying that fubar "lets you
foul things up".

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Credit check for interviews - was blocked
Next by Author: RE: Any pharmaceutical tech writers out there?
Previous by Thread: RE: Speaking of cookbooks...
Next by Thread: Naming conventions in a three-tiered system


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads