TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Does this argument include the "you can" construction? This construction
doesn't indicate permission (as "you may" would). We often use this
construction to avoid the wordy and less direct "allows you to"
construction.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Gold [mailto:peter -at- highsoft -dot- com]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:00 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Cc: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Active verbs (was: Basic Voice)
So long ago that I've completely forgotten its name, I read a book on
technical writing, that succinctly stated Chris' point here, namely that
users do things and technical publications shouldn't suggest that users
have to obtain permission from a computing system or component - what
Chris refers to as "CSF".
I think one issue in this discussion is the difference between the
familiar voice of conversation or discussion, vs. a writer's voice in
written documentation. It's common in US conversation, to use phrases that
include "lets," "enables," etc. I'm not sure other languages have this
convention. Written communication, designed for wider audiences than
participants in a conversation, has different requirements. This
difference is one aspect of evaluating one's audience, especially for
written material that will be translated to other languages.
Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.