RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong

Subject: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:04:20 -0500


A fan is a specific design...blades around an axle spun by a motor.

An Air Moving Device can be different designs...a bellows, a wheel, a number
of different designs.

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Barnes&Noble.com
jposada -at- book -dot- com
NY: 212-414-6656
Dayton: 732-438-3372
"Alright, nobody move! I've got a dragon here, and I'm not afraid to use it"
---------- Donkey



>>To me ... a fan, is a fan ... and one less acronym is needed in this
world.

To me too. I'm confused as to the engineer's point though...what kind of
gizmo inside a machine qualifies as an Air Moving Device (AMD), but not as a
fan (technically speaking, of course). Was this just an instance of someone
trying to substitute incomprehensible mumbo-jumbo for clear wording, or is
there an actual difference between the thing with spinning blades and an
AMD? If the latter, I've learned something new today and can go home. If
the former, I'm surprised the engineer had the cojones to put forth such an
asinine proposition.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Order RoboHelp Office X3 by March 14 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
plus FREE WebHelp Merge Module and FREE iMarkup Software, for a
total giveaway value of $439! Order today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Calling a Bug a Bug
Next by Author: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
Previous by Thread: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
Next by Thread: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads