RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong

Subject: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
From: jbfoster <jb -dot- foster -at- shaw -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:05:47 -0700


Often these cute acronyms are ways for individuals (or maybe groups) to
empower themselves over others. The classic example was (is) lawyer's lingo.
Society has agreed to do away with that ... do we really need to start it
all over, somewhere else?

I read Johns post further down (in the list) ... and adding bellows, Teflon
bearings, and a blessing from God, still doesn't change anything. When I
write service manuals, I don't want to confuse the reader, so therefore a
'fan is a fan!' There is an exception to this ... when the part truly is an
'Air Exchanger' ... but the idea is not to get cute and technical with the
reader.

Bruce


Watson Laughton wrote:

<snip>
> I'm confused as to the engineer's point though...what kind of
> gizmo inside a machine qualifies as an Air Moving Device (AMD),
> but not as a fan (technically speaking, of course).
> Was this just an instance of someone trying to substitute
> incomprehensible mumbo-jumbo for clear wording, or is
> there an actual difference between the thing with spinning blades and an
> AMD?
<snip>


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Order RoboHelp Office X3 by March 14 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
plus FREE WebHelp Merge Module and FREE iMarkup Software, for a
total giveaway value of $439! Order today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong: From: Watson Laughton

Previous by Author: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
Next by Author: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
Previous by Thread: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong
Next by Thread: RE: Perceptually true, Technically wrong


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads