Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers

Subject: Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers
From: Gene Kim-Eng <gene -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:32:23 -0700


I may be missing something, but I thought the original issue was how to deal
with a deterioration of civility and manners on the list. When did the volume of
traffic become the problem that needed to be dealt with?

Gene Kim-Eng



At 01:02 PM 7/15/2003 -0700, Tom Murrell wrote:

Guy,

I think you've identified the 29 people (by my count) who should go. <g>



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE? "Mustang" is a NEW single
sourcing tool for FrameMaker that lets you easily publish your content
online. No macro language required! http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See www.mercer.edu/mstco or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot-
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Limiting postings -- looking at numbers: From: Guy McDonald
Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers: From: Tom Murrell

Previous by Author: RE: Nielsen and PDFs
Next by Author: RE: The saga ended (or is it continuing? (was Re: A sticky contractor situation: no pay yet?)
Previous by Thread: Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers
Next by Thread: Re: Limiting postings -- looking at numbers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads