Re: Partnumbers

["Subash" <subash_tc -at- speedpost -dot- net>]

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 04:54:50 -0700 (PDT), "Goober Writer"
<gooberwriter -at- yahoo -dot- com> said:
> Well, I assume you mean "part" as in section of a
> document and not "part" as in pieces of a product.
> 
> Part numbers are no different than chapter numbers,
> only they pertain to a higher grouping. Most people
> use part numbers because they follow the same logic as
> chapter numbering, and so a part of a document can be
> easily referenced ("see Part 1" instead of "see
> chapters 1-5" or "see the section of the document
> pertaining to X").

I feel that it is not right to go by the literal definition of "part" and
"number". The concept of "part number" in my organization means the use a
unique number to identify a version of a particular document. It is for
the production, distribution, and access purposes. I would be interested
to know whether any of you use a similar concept.

-- 
  Subash Babu
  subash_tc -at- speedpost -dot- net

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE? "Mustang" is a NEW single
sourcing tool for FrameMaker that lets you easily publish your content
online. No macro language required! http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

Mercer University's online MS Program in Technical Communication Management:
Preparing leaders of tomorrow's technical communication organizations today.
See www.mercer.edu/mstco or write George Hayhoe at hayhoe_g -at- mercer -dot- edu -dot- 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.