Re: FrameMaker > Help > FrameMaker?

Subject: Re: FrameMaker > Help > FrameMaker?
From: Sean Brierley <seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:54:54 -0700 (PDT)

Some workflows just don't. Something probably has to
give, such as:

1) The expectations.
2) The software.
3) The timeframe.

That is, given enough resources, you can manually work
around the design of the tools you are using, but it
will be inefficient and take time. Or, you can switch
to tools that do what you want. Or, you can change
your expectations, and redefine what you really want
to better meet what your tool can do.



--- Gene Kim-Eng <techpubs -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> From Bill's original message, it doesn't sound as if
> he
> has the flexibility to select a different help
> authoring tool;
> his client wants him to author help in RoboHelp.


Re: FrameMaker > Help > FrameMaker?: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: RE: Tech writing makes the front page
Next by Author: RE: FrameMaker > Help > FrameMaker?
Previous by Thread: Re: FrameMaker > Help > FrameMaker?
Next by Thread: Re: FrameMaker > Help > FrameMaker?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads