RE: Performance appraisals

Subject: RE: Performance appraisals
From: "Erika Yanovich" <ERIKA_y -at- rad -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:45:43 +0300


Perhaps you could ask for another form (let's say for QA people) to see what's the company style in general and then adapt it. I know that companies have very different appraisal policies.
Erika

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: DB app recommendations?
Next by Author: RE: Documentation Phase in Software-Development Life Cycle
Previous by Thread: Performance appraisals
Next by Thread: RE: Performance appraisals


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads