[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word

Subject: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
From: Michele Davis <michele -at- krautgrrl -dot- com>
To: Goober Writer <gooberwriter -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:53:53 -0600

I realize I'll have to re-do my layout, Quark uses master pages as well, but the former designer didn't lay them out right (not enough information on the master pages).

My client hates using a PDF as an editing tool. Recommendations on helping educate him? I so rarely use PDF for reviews I'm not sure what the advantage would be. This particular client likes to make last minute changes.

--
Michele

I got out of Babylon, but there was no Zion. No Promised Land.
www.krautgrrl.com



Goober Writer wrote:


You'll have to re-do the layout in any app you switch
to. Unless it's coverned by a stylesheet or schema
(which it is probably not), content and layout are
divided and handled seperately. But, the "bauty" of
FrameMaker is that you create the layout on the master
pages once and can easily apply the layout as needed
in the body pages.
I don't use Word for documentation purposes (only for
memos and rough planning outlines, and other such
short or temporary documents), but even when I did, I
used PDF as my review/editing "environment".






Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word: From: Goober Writer

Previous by Author: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Next by Author: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Previous by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word
Next by Thread: Re: Quark & Frame vs. Word

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads