[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation)

Subject: Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation)
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "Dick Margulis" <margulis -at- fiam -dot- net>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:42:58 -0800

I may not have been clear enough on this point. I was referring to the
current designers, not the original ones. The original UNIX version of
Frame was quite brilliant for its time (though IMO, still not as good as
its primary competitor, Interleaf).

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick Margulis" <margulis -at- fiam -dot- net>

> That's harsh, Gene. The designers were on the bleeding edge of the
> technology of their respective days. They were hardly incompetent.




Follow-Ups:

References:
Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation): From: k k
Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation): From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation): From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation)
Next by Author: Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation)
Previous by Thread: Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation)
Next by Thread: Re: Multiple undo (was Re: Microsoft Documentation)

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads