RE: Editing .pdfs - to do or not to do is the question

Subject: RE: Editing .pdfs - to do or not to do is the question
From: "Bill Swallow" <wswallow -at- nycap -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "'HSC Italian'" <twins398 -at- hotmail -dot- com>, "'TECHWR-L'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 03:11:51 -0500

It's not a black or white issue. This article should help you with this
issue:

http://www.planetpdf.com/mainpage.asp?WebPageID=363

Bill Swallow
wswallow "at" nycap "dot" rr "dot" com

::: -----Original Message-----
::: "editing the .pdf of a document is not an option". The rule
::: I am accustomed
::: to is that any changes to the document are to done in the
::: source file, ONLY,
::: then a new .pdf is generated from the corrected source file.
:::
::: The editing process that is being proposed is this, if a
::: document has
::: changes the editor can make the changes in the .pdf and at
::: the same time the
::: writer can make the changes to the source. Perhaps I'm old
::: school and need
::: to be woken up, if so, PLEASE tell me. This proposed
::: process just seems
::: risky and counterproductive.






References:
Editing .pdfs - to do or not to do is the question: From: HSC Italian

Previous by Author: RE: "If the docs are too good..."
Next by Author: RE: Editing .pdfs - Continued
Previous by Thread: Re: Editing .pdfs - to do or not to do is the question
Next by Thread: FW: Editing .pdfs - to do or not to do is the question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads