TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>One more question, a new writer in our
>group (a former Motorola employee) insists
>that Motorola is the trendsetter for tech
>writing industry standards. Am I missing
>something or is this malarkey?
I recently finished an 18+ month contract at Motorola, and have to say I
didn't see that in the division ("sector" in Moto-speak) I worked in. They
were not in the dark ages, but not trendsetters either. We were using
FrameMaker 6, hoping to one day integrate the (Tech Pubs) user-doc templates
with the (Engineering) spec templates. There was one tentative project to
use XML, with the impetus coming from Engineering, not Tech Pubs. The sector
had just brought online a new web content-management system, which was an
improvement over the previous disparate systems, but nothing revolutionary.
My former group recently completed a usability study of one of the doc sets;
this is a good thing, but hardly a new thing.
On the other hand, Motorola is an enormous company. For example, the
wireless phone sector is much more consumer-oriented, and the government
services sector might be more likely to use SGML.
In any case, you need a stronger justification for whatever ideas this
person is pushing than "that's what we did at my old job".