Literate/Illiterate (WAS: Documenting installers?)

Subject: Literate/Illiterate (WAS: Documenting installers?)
From: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:16:00 -0400


While the detailing of Jay's experiences is certainly helpful I would
underline that techwriters have to be very careful about how or if their
biases show.

Not to direct criticism at Jay, but loaded terms like literate/illiterate
and technical/non-technical have to be used with restraint. In whole Jay's
post seem non-critical, but much of the terminology used in the thread
certainly seems judgmental.

Jay Malone wrote:
> *They all had a minimum of a master's degree. (job requirement.)
> *They knew a lot about their subject matter -- the non-
> technical aspect of their jobs.

And what is the non-technical subject matter? If they were ex-military
with masters degrees. I'd expect them to be a highly technical group. It's
just it would seem that computer expertise isn't necessary to their core
job functions.

A brain surgeon that can interpret MRIs and is a respected expert in their
field is certainly a highly technical person. Troubleshooting the latest
Windows bugs or installing the latest piece of hospital software is
certainly of little professional interest to them. It is also of little
added-value to the hospital or the patients if the doctor becomes an
accomplished systems administrator.

> *Many were the "most literate" because they were the only
> person at their site who had a computer at home.

Sometimes I have to chuckle at some of the TECHWR-L discussions. Software
writers have it easy. Technical writers in other fields often have to
write about tools and technology that none of their audience will ever
have at home. Although, I am bemused to admit that one of my students did
indeed know a former employee of NYCT that did have a fully functional
subway car running on a few hundred feet of track at his farm/cottage. :)

But it seems to be a common curse in the software sector. The techwriters
seem to be too far immersed in computers to realise that to many the
computer is no more interesting than a hammer or the inner workings of
ball-point pens.

The shock and indignation that some don't have any more interest in
computers than how to turn them on and get work done, is as misplaced as
the shock and disgust shown by automotive engineers when told most drivers
just want to turn the key and drive somewhere.

> *Many of the users with the fewest permissions needed to
> be told how to turn
> the computer on. Others didn't know the difference between
> Internet Explorer and Windows Explorer.

And if they have the fewest permissions, that should really be the basic
assumption. Considering that in many large 'managed PC' type companies
many users can't do more than turn them on and run one or two specific
applications. The same is true of many tools. There are an awful lot more
technicians that are expert tool users than there are craftsmen who
build/repair their own tools. And why should we expect anything different?

To many (most?) employees, the computer is just a tool they are forced to
use as part of their day job. They want to know how to eliminate items
from their to-do list(s) and send off e-mails with the least amount of
fuss so that they can get the day over with and get home to watch the
hockey game/play with the kids/go to the club. They certainly don't want
to know the intricacies of database management, TCP/IP, or POP.

And that isn't to say they aren't highly intelligent, focused, incredibly
technical, and in love with what they do for a living. Indeed they may
want to finish with all the mundane computer stuff so that they can go and
catch up on the latest in their field, be that brain surgery or
entomology.

Eric L. Dunn
Senior Technical Writer

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Documenting installers?: From: Jay . Malone

Previous by Author: RE: Documenting installers?
Next by Author: Re: Indexing whitepaper from Bright Path
Previous by Thread: RE: Documenting installers?
Next by Thread: Re: Documenting installers?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads