re: Re-architecting

Subject: re: Re-architecting
From: Sean Hower <hokumhome -at- freehomepage -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:04:57 -0700 (PDT)



------------------------------
Goldstein, Dan wrote:
Google gives "re-architecting" 10,400 results -- throw in all the
various verb forms and you get to nearly 40,000 results (shudder). I have nothing against jargon, but does it have to be so darn ugly?
------------------------------

One I keep hearing is incentivize and incentivization. Given back formation (orientation to orientate), I wonder how long it will take for incentivizate to appear.



********************************************
Sean Hower - tech writer
http://hokum.freehomepage.com


_____________________________________________________________
Create your own web site for FREE at http://www.freehomepage.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: re: Linking to a topic file from a Web page
Next by Author: different output same hlp
Previous by Thread: Re-architecting
Next by Thread: Interviews & red flags


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads