Re: Multi-purpose / Single source

Subject: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source
From: TechComm Dood <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:40:31 -0500


It's only overkill if you're rolling your own solution that does the
same as an existing pre-fab solution. But, if you plan to leverage XML
for other purposes, then it does make sense to go that route.


On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:36:35 -0500, T.W. Smith <techwordsmith -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>
> IMHO, XML is overkill if the FrameMaker GUI or FM + WWP 2003 GUIs
> efficiently do what you need. The reason I think that is I sense a
> need to author in a document-unfriendly package and then add a
> database and/or custom programming ... of course, I may be
> overthinking the complexity of the XML stuff, but if it's not complex,
> use the efficiencies FM + WWP give.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Re: Multi-purpose / Single source: From: David Neeley
Re: Multi-purpose / Single source: From: Sharon Burton
Re: Multi-purpose / Single source: From: T.W. Smith

Previous by Author: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source
Next by Author: Re: New Writer Seeks Advice
Previous by Thread: Re: Multi-purpose / Single source
Next by Thread: RE: Multi-purpose / Single source


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads