RE: Why not Word97?

Subject: RE: Why not Word97?
From: "Goldstein, Dan" <DGoldstein -at- DeusTech -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:38:08 -0500


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Hart
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 5:18 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Why not Word97?
>
> > Adria Quinones wondered: <<I have a new job at a great company with
> > only one problem: they use Word97 running on XP.>>
>
> Not sure why this is a problem. Word 97 and 2000 are probably
> the last really good versions of Word...

I second the motion. Keep using Word 97 for as long as you can -- you'll be
the envy of us all.

Dan Goldstein

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Striving To Increase The Page Count Was: Estimation of the nu mber of pages...
Next by Author: RE: Toilet Brush Warning Wins Consumer Award
Previous by Thread: Re: Why not Word97?
Next by Thread: Re: Why not Word97?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads