Re: Do I want it?

Subject: Re: Do I want it?
From: Jeffrey Osier-Mixon <jefro -at- jefro -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 14:09:37 -0700


Traditional usage did imply that a bitmap was a one-bit image mapped onto a grid. However, current usage definitely takes into account multiple bits per pixel. They map numerical information (bits) onto a grid (map), with each number describing one picture element (pixel). The descriptive number is now a hexadecimal value rather than a simple 1 or 0, but the logic is identical.

I also avoid the term "raster", which although often used as an adjective is actually a noun referring to a video screen's display area. We often refer to this as "screen resolution"---the latter term is far more descriptive.
I guess realistically a "raster image" would refer to an image designed for display on a video screen. In reality, the common usage in the circles I frequent matches your experience---the terms "raster" and "bitmap" are very, very often used interchangeably with regard to describing the structure of a digital image file, with the opposite term being "vector". I doubt anyone with any experience would be confused by this usage.

Some links, as requested:

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/b/bit_map.html
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/r/raster.html

Pedantically yours

Jefro



Joe Malin wrote:

Dear Fred,

My first reaction was "wow."

I've been studying computer graphics since 1980, and I have always used
"raster" and "bitmap" interchangeably. You are the first person who
pointed this out. Besides Adobe, does anyone else use this distinction?
If anyone has a reference, please e-mail me.

Raster was the original term used. I think that bitmap is a lot more
descriptive, and doesn't carry the CRT "baggage" of raster.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Question: Outside US?
Next by Author: Re: FAQs - Good or bad?
Previous by Thread: Re: Do I want it?
Next by Thread: Apology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads