Re: Do I want it?

Subject: Re: Do I want it?
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:17:01 -0700


On an absolute basis it's not. But on a practical, day-to-day basis,
"as large as possible" will mean the native resolution of whatever
was used to produce the image. If your company is making drum
scans of high-resolution images from film rather than collecting the
output of 3-5 megapixel digital cameras or the screen caps from
a 1600x1200 displays, there's a pretty good chance it has a real need to preserve them for future use. You may not do all your
work in the original, high-res image, but having and not using it
is almost always better than needing and not having it. Unless,
of course, you're running a dept like the one you described in the
beginning of your message that collects huge repositories of images
without keeping track them. And being asked for publication-suitable versions of technical illustrations is not rare in any of the industries I've worked in - it's something that has happened to me on a regular basis at just about every company I've worked in for the past 10 years. It might be a more common occurrence for more tech pubs, groups, if they produced information of sufficient quality and could manage and make it readily available.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message ----- From: "David Neeley" <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>

I realize that few on this list will be familiar with images of this
magnitude--but the original formulation was "as much resolution as
possible"...and even 2,000 dpi is not as "large as possible."



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Do I want it?: From: Joe Malin
Re: Do I want it?: From: David Neeley
Re: Do I want it?: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Do I want it?: From: David Neeley

Previous by Author: Re: Do I want it?
Next by Author: Re: LONG - A colloquial writing style?
Previous by Thread: Re: Do I want it?
Next by Thread: Re: Do I want it?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads