Department of redundancy department

Subject: Department of redundancy department
From: Eva Whitley <eva -dot- whitley -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:16:48 -0400


>From a document my collegue is editing: "Each switch is populated with
various modules. In some instances, these modules are redundant and in
other instances they are not redundant."

So, is this statement redundant?

--
Eva Whitley qstew63512469 -at- qis -dot- net
www.evawhitley.net
Jack L. Chalker, RIP Dec. 17, 1944-Feb. 11, 2005

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro!
Completely XML-based online publishing. Easily create 14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a streamlined project-based workflow. Word version ships in June, FrameMaker version ships in July. Sign up for a live, online demo! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: First usage question (are we wrong?)
Next by Author: RE: Workflow Suggestions Needed
Previous by Thread: RE: Client Newsletter
Next by Thread: Re: Department of redundancy department


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads