Re: Documenting wizards that have numbered "steps"

Subject: Re: Documenting wizards that have numbered "steps"
From: Super Genius <wade -dot- courtney -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:37:53 -0700

I think that if the wizard is constructed correctly, there is no need
to document it.


On 6/1/05, l_migliorini -at- yahoo -dot- com <l_migliorini -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> I am curious to know how others handle the following situation.


"My dear, I used to think that I was serving humanity... and I
pleasured in the thought. Then I discovered that humanity does not
want to be served; on the contrary it resents any attempt to serve it.
So now I do what pleases Jubal Harshaw."
Wade Courtney
Yahoo: wcourtne


New from Quadralay Corporation: WebWorks ePublisher Pro! Easily create
14 online formats, including 6 Help systems, in a project-based
workflow. Live, online demo!

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Bad Office Organization
Next by Author: Re: How about including your location in your sig?
Previous by Thread: RE: Documenting wizards that have numbered "steps"
Next by Thread: Re: Documenting wizards that have numbered "steps"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads