Re: general topic of spelling

Subject: Re: general topic of spelling
From: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:50:39 -0500

I've been doing some research recently as part of a proposal I'm
working on for submission to the government--for machine translation
software that will translate input from various other languages into
"good enough" English.

As a result, I have been reading with some interest about linguistic
trends over time.

It appears that the kind of simplification of grammar that is so
apparent these days in English is common in nearly every language.
They vary in the speed of this transition, but without exception I
have been able to find, languages tend to become grammatically simpler
and richer in vocabulary as time passes.

As it happens, English is part of a general language group known as
"Indo-European". Modern languages in Western Europe are nearly all
from this base (other than Basque and, I believe, Finnish). It turns
out that Lithuanian seems to be among the most archaic of the
Indo-European languages--and its grammar rules constitute a fairly
good superset of the grammar rules of most other I-E languages. In
fact, Lithuanian is surprisingly close to Farsi--and both are clearly
related to ancient Sanskrit. (A friend who speaks passable Lithuanian
happened to go to a bank in Kaunas with a friend who speaks no
Lithuanian but does speak Farsi--and understood nearly the entire

(Pardon if you already knew all this--I find it fascinating!)

Thus, those of us who often lament what seems to be the "degradation"
of the language are quickly becoming troglodytes of a sort--railing
against the inevitable simplification of the language.

In my view, though, we should all join a movement to simplify English
spelling and make it more regular! Think of the endless generations of
young students who would thank us!


On 6/15/05, Phillip St. James <saint0 -at- verizon -dot- net> wrote:
> Great question, James, but I wonder whether you referring to human generated
> typos or spell checker mistakes, or both.


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

general topic of spelling: From: James Jones
Re: general topic of spelling: From: Phillip St. James

Previous by Author: Re: Bad Office Organization
Next by Author: Re: Screen capture software
Previous by Thread: Re: general topic of spelling
Next by Thread: RE: general topic of spelling

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads