RE: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?

Subject: RE: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?
From: "Claire Conant" <Claire -dot- Conant -at- Digeo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:58:11 -0700




Not in my opinion they aren't. I use my physical dictionaries more than
I use the web based ones. I usually reference one or two different
dictionaries: Merriam-Webster, American Heritage. I find the physical
ones have more information, plus, I'm a self-proclaimed bibliophile.

That said I do use the net for researching industry-specific terminology
or spelling of brand names and trademarks.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: labeled information in bold; labels themselves, not in bold
Next by Author: Info beyond the user guide for WWP
Previous by Thread: Re: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?
Next by Thread: Re: Dictionaries...are physical ones obsolete?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads