Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?

Subject: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
From: Rachel Rawlings <rachel -at- scrivovivo -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:53:05 -0400


David Neeley wrote:

>Rachel,
>
>I don't know the answer to your question, but you realize that 1.1 is
>three versions behind the current version (1.4)? Much has changed even
>in that interval.
>
>
The current stable version is actually 1.1.4, which is what I'm using. I
referred to it only by the major.minor designation, and I apologize if
this was confusing. The splash logo, however, still says 1.1.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?: From: Bruce Byfield
Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?: From: Rachel Rawlings

Previous by Author: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Next by Author: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Previous by Thread: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Next by Thread: RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads