Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?

Subject: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- alltel -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:35:41 -0400


Late entry, but I don't think I've seen this point raised yet...

At more than one place I've worked, no unauthorized software
was to be installed because:

1. The systems were being used to handle financial data.
2. There was a contract with a company to provide software.
3. If there was a problem, they wanted to be able to sue
someone. You cannot sue 13 more-or-less anonymous
developers scattered over eight countries.

It wasn't a problem of support. It was insurance, like the
old-style gangster insurance. "You screw this up, we break
your leg."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: techwr-l digest: August 05, 2005 - ISO Certification
Next by Author: Re: Quality
Previous by Thread: RE: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?
Next by Thread: Re: Why Aren't Open Source Tools Being Considered?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads