TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: OT: Wikipedia as a reference source From:Stuart Burnfield <sburnf -at- au1 -dot- ibm -dot- com> To:Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net> Date:Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:22:25 +0800
Thanks, Dick. I'll have a look at it on the weekend.
My own opinion is that Wikipedia is an *excellent* reference tool when used
wisely.
Yes, it's a rich stew or fact, opinion, error, advice, prejudice and hidden
assumptions. Does that remind you of anything? It's just like techwr-l!
Fact for fact, our beloved list is probably even less reliable than
Wikipedia, but it's still so useful because we quickly learn how to sort
the wheat from the chaff.
I don't use Wikipedia a lot for work-related questions. I wouldn't trust it
as a final source for anything important, but so often it's the first place
I look, because it helps to work out what questions to ask next.
Stuart
Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net> wrote on 28/07/2006 05:58:23 PM:
> On a more serious note, this week's New Yorker has an excellent article
> on Wikipedia; it provides a more complete picture of strengths,
> weaknesses, and internal processes than I'd seen elsewhere. Worth a read
> for anyone interested in the subject.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l